From: Gene Selkov Jr. <selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov>
To: Gregory W Burnham <gburnham@sfu.ca>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 01:25:22 -0500
Message-ID: <199902010723.BAA13407@mail.xnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00ae01be4d6e$dedfc1e0$8d0835d1@bconnected.net>
> Right. That would be a place where you couldn't use Matthew's
> suggestion. But in my case my 'client' is, ultimately, a cgi.
> And now I'm wondering, why am I not using files? I would hope
> that postgres would be providing me with some kind of superior
> performance than the file system. Infact, I've always assumed
> it. But was I right to assume that? Are there benchmarks out
> there?
No benchmarks are needed. Large objects are stored one per file,
therefore you will see the same preformance.
--Gene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov, gburnham@sfu.ca
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
In-Reply-To: <199902010723.BAA13407@mail.xnet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox