From: marten@feki.toppoint.de
To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za
Cc: stuart@comodo.net
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] 8k limit
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:41:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <199910270641.IAA16655@feki.phoenix-edv.netzservice.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23186.940954609@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>
> There has been discussion of fixing this, eg by making a subdirectory
> tree for LOs, but I'd rather see us put our effort into eliminating
> the tuple length limit.
>
This would be very nice - because this also means to get SQL
statements that may really be 8k long !
Perhaps you all remember a rather complex view statement I posted here
some days ago, where postgresql said something like "rule too large" and
this seems to be a limitation for me. Actually as a user one does not know
when this limit is reached by the system.
All "we" (the users :-)) know about the 8192 byte limit of an SQL statement,
but this is not the whole truth.
Marten
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: marten@feki.toppoint.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za, stuart@comodo.net
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] 8k limit
In-Reply-To: <199910270641.IAA16655@feki.phoenix-edv.netzservice.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox