pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Cc: Peter Mount (Home) <peter@retep.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 12:43:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200005021643.MAA20306@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4100.957283324@sss.pgh.pa.us>

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> >> Not to bug you Peter, but 7.0 may not wait three days before release.
> 
> > I would vote that this is important enough that it should wait, but no
> > one has raised the issue until now so we haven't discussed it.
> 
> My two cents: I wouldn't object to postponing release a day or so for
> it, *but* if what we're getting is an un-beta-tested driver then my
> level of enthusiasm drops considerably.  I'd rather say "it'll get
> fixed in 7.0.1, after a decent testing interval for the new driver".
> 
> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now
> work with 7.0?  If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver
> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs.  If the answer is
> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got.

As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas.  The driver must
have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version.  Only since I
installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026



view thread (46+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200005021643.MAA20306@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200005021643.MAA20306@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200005021643.MAA20306@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk, lamar.owen@wgcr.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, peter@retep.org.uk
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
  In-Reply-To: <200005021643.MAA20306@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox