From: darcy@druid.net
To: pgsql-interfaces@PostgreSQL.org
Cc: pgsql-announce@PostgreSQL.org
Subject: Merging PyGreSQL development into PostgreSQL
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 11:10:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20010303161058.CBACB1A74@druid.net> (raw)
As some of you may have already noticed, after discussions with Thomas
Lockhart I have officially moved the development of PyGreSQL directly
into the PostgreSQL tree. I think that this will be beneficial to both
the PostgreSQL project and PyGreSQL.
We were talking about the PyGreSQL version number and whether I should
switch to tracking the PostgreSQL version number instead of using an
independent one. Thomas points out that others may think that they
need to upgrade when they don't need to because the number got bumped.
On the other hand I think that people should start building PyGreSQL
in conjunction with PostgreSQL anyway so that may not be an issue.
Anyone have any ideas one way or the other?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: darcy@druid.net, pgsql-announce@PostgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Merging PyGreSQL development into PostgreSQL
In-Reply-To: <20010303161058.CBACB1A74@druid.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox