From: jtv <jtv@xs4all.nl>
To: pgsql-interfaces@commandprompt.com
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libpq++ in Apache Problem.
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:33:47 +0200
Message-ID: <20010531173347.C29317@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105290742210.6036-100000@commandprompt.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105290742210.6036-100000@commandprompt.com>
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 07:42:46AM -0700, pgsql-interfaces@commandprompt.com wrote:
>
> The next step in trouble-shooting this I suppose is to build the dummy
> Apache module with libpq++ and see if it the same behavior is exhibited.
> If not, it's got to be something deeper in the core of my module.
Have you tried using just libpq, and just "inlining" the code that libpq++
*should* be executing based on your invocations? Sounds like you don't even
need the PQresult structure to reproduce the problem, so it should be doable.
Jeroen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: jtv@xs4all.nl, pgsql-interfaces@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: libpq++ in Apache Problem.
In-Reply-To: <20010531173347.C29317@xs4all.nl>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox