pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedODBC problem/question
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* ODBC problem/question
@ 2002-09-10 19:42 Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Meskes @ 2002-09-10 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces; PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Hi,
I was just contacted by a customer about the SQLProcedureColumns call in
our odbc driver. It appears this call is undefined in the standard odbc
driver but is available in odbcplus. Could anyone please enlighten me
why this was forked and not merged into one driver? Is there a problem
when I take the odbcplus code and put it into the odbc driver?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: ODBC problem/question
@ 2002-09-10 20:40 Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2002-09-10 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>; pgsql-interfaces; PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes@postgresql.org]
> Sent: 10 September 2002 20:42
> To: PostgreSQL Interfaces; PostgreSQL Hacker
> Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was just contacted by a customer about the
> SQLProcedureColumns call in our odbc driver. It appears this
> call is undefined in the standard odbc driver but is
> available in odbcplus. Could anyone please enlighten me why
> this was forked and not merged into one driver? Is there a
> problem when I take the odbcplus code and put it into the
> odbc driver?
Hi Michael,
There are currently 3 variants of the driver.
PostgreSQL - This is the current ODBC 2.5 compliant driver.
PostgreSQL+ - This is a development version that is ODBC 3.0 compliant.
PostgreSQL+ Unicode - This is PostgreSQL+ with Unicode support.
We are aiming for PostgreSQL+ Unicode to be the only driver as soon as
possible, but due to the way ODBC3 and Unicode support were added (ie.
quickly, to solve immediate problems), we (Hiroshi & I) felt it was best
to keep them seperate until we were sure of their reliability.
Currently, PostgreSQL+ seems pretty good as, does the Unicode version,
though that is still missing some features iirc.
HTH, Regards, Dave.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-10 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-10 19:42 ODBC problem/question Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
2002-09-10 20:40 Re: ODBC problem/question Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox