pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:06:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200303211806.h2LI6OS20341@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14166.1048269607@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > But isn't that like saying that the spec doesn't apply to libpq at all. 
> > Why would autocommit not apply but other queries specification apply?
> 
> No, you're missing the point.  Essentially all the client libraries
> offer their own autocommit behavior on top of what the spec says.

Well, which ones?  jdbc (which prevers the server autocommit), ecpg,
odbc (?), and Perl.  Anyone else?

> libpq is alone in not having any such client-side logic.  So it's not
> a foregone conclusion that we should implement autocommit on/off logic
> on the server side as a substitute for adding it to libpq.  We have
> now tried doing it on the server side, and we are finding that we don't
> like the side-effects; so it's time to revisit that decision.

My concern is bloating the API for all languages based on libpq, and
psql and stuff like that.  Heck, even pgadmin would have to have a
button for it because a SET couldn't control it.

I know the server-side isn't optimal, but is the alternative worse?

Also, if Peter wants clients to be able to just issue a query and know
it commits, should we just disable setting autocommit in postgresql.conf
and per-user/db, and force applications to turn it on explicitly?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



view thread (133+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200303211806.h2LI6OS20341@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200303211806.h2LI6OS20341@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200303211806.h2LI6OS20341@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
  In-Reply-To: <200303211806.h2LI6OS20341@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox