pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: george young <gry@ll.mit.edu>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: pygresql build/install problems: use setup.py?
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:24:32 -0400
Message-ID: <20030514152432.3097dd89.gry@ll.mit.edu> (raw)

[python 2.3a1 & 2.2, postgresql 7.3.2 & 7.2.1, x86 linux]

As you note from the above line, I'm wrangling multiple versions
of python and postgres[ql].  I use the PyGreSQL interface from the
postgres source dist.  But I need to install PyGreSQL for other
than the default python.  I know I could hack it by hand, but it
seems like there could be an optional arg to configure like:

  ./configure --with-python=python2.3

to specify a binary (and include files and lib install destination)
other than the default.  Maybe it needs a separate option:

  --python-include=/usr/local/include/python-2.3 

I'm hoping some autoconf wiz will take this in hand -- auto* stuff
scares me...

I succeeded by fixing up setup.py:
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
--- setup.py~   Tue Mar 19 08:21:14 2002
+++ setup.py    Wed May 14 15:10:30 2003
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
        optional_libs=[ 'libpqdll', 'wsock32', 'advapi32' ]
        data_files = [ 'libpq.dll' ]
 else:
-       include_dirs=['/usr/include/pgsql']
-       library_dirs=['usr/lib/pgsql']
+       include_dirs=['../../include','../libpq','/usr/include/pgsql']
+       library_dirs=['../libpq','/usr/lib/pgsql']
        optional_libs=['pq']
        data_files = []
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Isn't this the right thing to do?  It should use the .. lib and include
dirs if they exist, since these are sure to be correct, as opposed
to hard coded /usr/lib/pgsql and /usr/include/pgsql which might 
not exist until an install has been done, and worse, might be from
an older postgres version.

It seems like the makefiles should just run
   $PYTHON setup.py build
and
   $PYTHON setup.py install

since setup.py has a much better chance of installing in the right
directories, or am I missing something?

-- 
 I cannot think why the whole bed of the ocean is
 not one solid mass of oysters, so prolific they seem. Ah,
 I am wandering! Strange how the brain controls the brain!
	-- Sherlock Holmes in "The Dying Detective"



view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20030514152432.3097dd89.gry@ll.mit.edu>
Permalink:  ../20030514152432.3097dd89.gry@ll.mit.edu/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20030514152432.3097dd89.gry@ll.mit.edu

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: gry@ll.mit.edu
  Subject: Re: pygresql build/install problems: use setup.py?
  In-Reply-To: <20030514152432.3097dd89.gry@ll.mit.edu>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox