From: Jonathan Gardner <jgardner@jonathangardner.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Some quick notes about extending libpq for new protocol
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 08:42:25 -0700
Message-ID: <200306090842.26352.jgardner@jonathangardner.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9481.1054574376@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <9481.1054574376@sss.pgh.pa.us>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 June 2003 10:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> * Better FunctionCall API?
>
> nah, just deprecate in favor of invoking the function via
> PQexecParams().
>
I'll admit -- the current state of PQfn is practically unuseable. However, the
idea is pretty cool. I think it would be nice to have a direct function call
mechanism that bypasses the parser.
Of course, I don't think I understand completely what PQexecParams would do...
:-(
- --
Jonathan Gardner <jgardner@jonathangardner.net>
(was jgardn@alumni.washington.edu)
Live Free, Use Linux!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+5KrhWgwF3QvpWNwRAjTlAKCUqaI77lEPxonGo2gR3c0e38lJuACeLzJe
2Sr1bewQmQT4B72bALFf9HQ=
=9SC8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: jgardner@jonathangardner.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Some quick notes about extending libpq for new protocol
In-Reply-To: <200306090842.26352.jgardner@jonathangardner.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox