From: Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: AgentM <agentm@cmu.edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:31:24 +1000
Message-ID: <200306271231.24667.philip@utiba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306270216.h5R2GbK29325@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200306270216.h5R2GbK29325@candle.pha.pa.us>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:16 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> BSD/OS supports:
>
> The pthreads library conforms to IEEE Std1003.1c
> (``POSIX'').
>
> How is that different from UNIX98?
Just checked up on this: apparently version "g" of the standard does contain
such manipulation functions... and Tru64's man page for
pthread_mutexattr_settype claims:
Interfaces documented on this reference page conform to industry standards
as follows:
IEEE Std 1003.1c-1995, POSIX System Application Program Interface
Of course, they might be lying.
Anyway, hopefully I can just avoid these recursive locks, and avoid finding
out who supports what.
Regards, Philip.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: philip@utiba.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, agentm@cmu.edu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux
In-Reply-To: <200306271231.24667.philip@utiba.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox