From: Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Incremental results from libpq
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:33:20 +0100
Message-ID: <200511102133.20904.ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877jbgb8x5.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
References: <4D426B54-E08F-4DE9-9776-D46610CA4968@slamb.org>
<200511101751.55377.ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
<877jbgb8x5.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
> > If I'm informed correctly then Oracle and others are generating
> > the complete static result set on the server-side, which will then
> > stay cached until all rows/chunks are fetched.
> That's obviously not true. Try doing "select * from huge_table" on Oracle
> and you'll see records start appearing immediately.
Then it seems I haven't (been informed correctly) :)
Now, given that OCI is offering some kind of asynchronous interface as well,
how are they handling an error occuring after a partial result-set has been
retrieved by the client?
--
Best,
Frank.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl, gsstark@mit.edu
Subject: Re: Incremental results from libpq
In-Reply-To: <200511102133.20904.ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox