From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: smacedo@calmetric.pt
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: LabView and PostgreSQL ; and RecordSet GetString performance
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:22:24 -0400
Message-ID: <24046.1124943744@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000401c5a929$6c0cf930$0302a8c0@plexus>
References: <000401c5a929$6c0cf930$0302a8c0@plexus>
"Silvio Macedo" <smacedo@calmetric.pt> writes:
> - on the other hand, in OLE/ODBC, RecordSet.GetString is about 10
> times slower than native OLEDB to get 20K records (tstamp,value).
> Anybody had this sort of performance hit on GetString on PostgreSQL
> ODBC?
> Any tips? Any special connection string tuning?
No idea about this myself --- but if you don't get any answers here,
please try the specialized pgsql-odbc list.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, smacedo@calmetric.pt
Subject: Re: LabView and PostgreSQL ; and RecordSet GetString performance
In-Reply-To: <24046.1124943744@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox