From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:36:27 -0500
Message-ID: <25711.1047339387@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303102330.h2ANUii26036@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200303102330.h2ANUii26036@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> So, what should we do? Should we go another month or two and just wait
> until we have enough must-have features? While not waiting on specific
> features, it _is_ waiting for something to warrant a release. I guess
> the big question is whether we release on a scheduled-basis or a
> enough-features-basis.
"Enough features" is such a judgment call that no one can predict what
the schedule will be, if that's part of the decision.
I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if
you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows
port. (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol
stuff I've taken on...) I don't want to see it pushed further than that
without good concrete arguments for doing so.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, justin@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign)
In-Reply-To: <25711.1047339387@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox