From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>
Cc: Peter Mount <petermount@maidstone.gov.uk>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:50:45 -0400
Message-ID: <28695.972489045@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <215896B6B5E1CF11BC5600805FFEA82103D982D7@sirius.edu.sollentuna.se>
References: <215896B6B5E1CF11BC5600805FFEA82103D982D7@sirius.edu.sollentuna.se>
Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> Perhaps a good long-term solution for this would be to support
> INFORMATION_SCHEMA per SQL92? This requires basic schema support, of course
> :-)
Yes, I think that's the right answer in the long run. Won't happen for
a release or three though...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mha@sollentuna.net, petermount@maidstone.gov.uk, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects
In-Reply-To: <28695.972489045@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox