From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: justinb@mr-boo.com, justinb@tricord.com, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: libpq++
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 15:25:36 -0400
Message-ID: <299.988917936@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105031915.f43JFpf12056@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200105031915.f43JFpf12056@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I think he is creating his own shared memory area:
Oh, I see. Isn't that pretty silly, considering that there's no way
for such objects to share a DBconnection if they are in different
application processes? Seems like a simple static variable would do
the job just as well with a lot fewer portability and resource-leakage
issues...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Subject: Re: Re: libpq++
In-Reply-To: <299.988917936@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox