From: Ken J. Wright <ken@ori-ind.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Reply-To: missing
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:56:18 -0700
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19990630075618.00a93d30@ori-ind.com> (raw)
I could not find on the PostgreSQL web site, who to send this to, so I'll
just start here because at least I won't get bounced. There is no Reply-To:
line in the messages recieved from this list. So just hitting reply in my
mail client will always default To: to the sender of the original message.
Consequently, I have to always remember to change the To: back to the list,
or always cc: the list and know that the original sender is always getting
two messages. Could this be changed? Or is there a good reason that it is,
and should stay this way? This is the only list of many that I subscribe to
that has this annoyance.
Cheers!
Ken
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: ken@ori-ind.com
Subject: Re: Reply-To: missing
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19990630075618.00a93d30@ori-ind.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox