From: jing han <jing_han_66@yahoo.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: postgres 8.1.8 transaction ID wrapper around related problem
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:59:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <349058.47955.qm@web53512.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
Hello,
I have a transaction ID wrapper around related problem:
Does vacuum freeze only need to be done when initdb? is it a one time thing, only do it once??? no more??
in my system, when I use
select datname, age(datfrozenxid) from pg_database;
I get the following data:
datname age
postgres 2075973034
netman 2117293144
template1 1795797763
template0 2075973034
I'm worried about the age for template0, I would think when initdb, template0 has already been vacuum freezed,
the datallowconn for template0 is set to false, we cannot connect template0. If the age for template0 keep going up,
will it meet transaction ID wrapper around problem??? Is one more vacuum freeze on template0 needed???
jing
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: jing_han_66@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: postgres 8.1.8 transaction ID wrapper around related problem
In-Reply-To: <349058.47955.qm@web53512.mail.yahoo.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox