From: Constantin Teodorescu <teo@flex.ro>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Cc: rdboer@hrs-rotterdam.nl, spider@chatswood.alphanet.net.au, Bugs for PostgreSQL <bugs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Char types with ODBC and Access 97
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 12:12:38 +0200
Message-ID: <3518D896.8AB3AA4@flex.ro> (raw)
References: <199803250141.UAA23263@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I find it also very strange that pgaccess 0.84 is reporting a field size of
> > -5 for varchar type, and psql reports the correct size.
>
> Yes, this looks like a bug in pgaccess when I ask for Object/Information
> on a table that contains a char(). Perhaps the author could look at
> psql.c to see how we handle these special cases in the \d command. [I
> am CC'ing the pgaccess author on this.]
Yes. It's a bug.
I'm trying to find some time to fix it.
--
Constantin Teodorescu
FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: teo@flex.ro, maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, bugs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Char types with ODBC and Access 97
In-Reply-To: <3518D896.8AB3AA4@flex.ro>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox