From: Phil Thompson <phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 18:21:17 +0000
Message-ID: <3548C11D.BE04EDC4@river-bank.demon.co.uk> (raw)
References: <11094.893887279@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Phil Thompson <phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We should change the protocol version number to 2.0.
> >> It would be possible for the backend to continue to support 1.0 clients,
> >> if you think it's worth the trouble to do so.
>
> > Or 1.1? The changes don't seem too traumatic.
>
> Well, pqcomm.h says that an incompatible change should have a new major
> version number, and minor though these changes be, they *are*
> incompatible.
Err...good point :)
> >> Command Done
> >> Byte1('Z')
>
> > The completion response already does this for successful queries, and
> > the error response for unsuccessful ones.
>
> You missed the point:
I've misunderstood the protocol - and the protocol specification is
therefore wrong (or at least incomplete) in this respect. Do you want
to fix the spec and include your enhancements or shall I?
Phil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
In-Reply-To: <3548C11D.BE04EDC4@river-bank.demon.co.uk>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox