From: Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 03:32:54 +0000
Message-ID: <36539166.A9FEAA7E@alumni.caltech.edu> (raw)
References: <000501be119e$6c16efa0$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com>
<19981117101824.C2181@usa.net>
<36517DEF.7989C4EC@alumni.caltech.edu>
<19981117203009.E1442@usa.net>
<36523DB2.BF0984CA@alumni.caltech.edu>
<19981118084843.B869@usa.net>
> But wouldn't it be more useful to preprocess the query and store the
> resulting nodes instead? We don't want to parse the statement
> everytime a variable binding comes in.
Sure. Sorry I wasn't being very specific. Also, whoever implements it
gets to do it either way at first :)
btw, I'm buried in trying to get a CASE statement to work, so am not
volunteering for this one...
- Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, meskes@usa.net, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
In-Reply-To: <36539166.A9FEAA7E@alumni.caltech.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox