From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgreSQL.org>
Cc: Craig Orsinger <orsingerc@epg-gw1.lewis.army.mil>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 14:18:13 +0000
Message-ID: <3767B225.DA868563@alumni.caltech.edu> (raw)
References: <19990614091647.A562@gmx.net>
<XFMail.990615111924.orsingerc@epg-gw1.lewis.army.mil>
<19990616153740.B1575@gmx.net>
> > I don't know if this makes you wrong, but Informix supports
> > an INTO clause in a cursor declaration. It's one of the things I had to
> > change while porting some applications from Informix ESQL/C to ECPG.
> > Here's what Informix says about the INTO clause in their training
> > materials for ESQL/C:
> So you think we should add this? I have no idea at the moment if it causes
> problems with the parser but I will add this to my todo list.
I'd suggest *not* adding this non-SQL92 feature. afaik it adds no
functionality, so why bother messing with it? btw, OpenIngres1.1 did
not have this syntax either.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, meskes@postgreSQL.org, orsingerc@epg-gw1.lewis.army.mil
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation
In-Reply-To: <3767B225.DA868563@alumni.caltech.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox