pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tim Brookes <tim.brookes@mcmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: libpq++ tracing considered harmful (was Re: libpq++ memory problems)
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:28:15 -0400
Message-ID: <38FF4C3F.D79FCF4D@wgcr.org> (raw)
References: <38FB6FA1.C63B030B@mcmail.com>
	<16483.956019092@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<38FEB8DB.DBC3460E@mcmail.com>
	<2182.956243193@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<38FF2126.9525DB82@mcmail.com>
	<38FF243E.E5C0E87E@wgcr.org>
	<8163.956252492@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<38FF471B.4463ECF2@wgcr.org>
	<8280.956254952@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> >> Perhaps something can be salvaged from the wreckage, but for now the
> >> right answer is just to make sure that this code is not compiled.
 
> > And to compile this code you supply _which_ configure option?
 
> It isn't a configure option --- you have to edit libpq++'s makefile
> to enable it.  Or, in the case of the 6.5.* code, it got turned on
> anyway :-(.

Now that is just grand.  It will be a happy day once all the various
configuration options, both runtime and compiletime, are brought under
the GrandReUnification umbrella that Peter E is weaving right now....  

> Fortunately there is no security hole in either 6.5.*
> or current, since the code is too broken to actually produce any
> trace output, compiled or not.

That's what I thought you said.  Which, in this case, a bug was a good
thing -- as if the code hadn't been buggy, we'd have had a security bug.
~:-] 

> My point was mainly that I thought
> we should remove the code rather than fix it.

Who added the code in the first place?  Would anyone _need_ it? 
Otherwise, I agree -- _can_ it, if it's not too big of a change this
close to release (methinks not, but, you never know).

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <38FF4C3F.D79FCF4D@wgcr.org>
Permalink:  ../38FF4C3F.D79FCF4D@wgcr.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/38FF4C3F.D79FCF4D@wgcr.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: lamar.owen@wgcr.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, tim.brookes@mcmail.com
  Subject: Re: libpq++ tracing considered harmful (was Re: libpq++ memory problems)
  In-Reply-To: <38FF4C3F.D79FCF4D@wgcr.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox