From: John Thorhauer <jthorhauer@phoenixcolor.com>
To: postgres-inter <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: jdbc large object support ??
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 16:41:50 -0400
Message-ID: <3976128E.97AF0074@phoenixcolor.com> (raw)
References: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0007191309550.148-100000@van4>
Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
>
> Take a look at the mailing list archive. This question was discussed in
> great detail during the last couple of days. You use setBytes() and
> getBytes() instead of streams, for details see the archive.
>
OK. I looked at that and I saw someone mention something about using
the text type to store data. What I am doing is trying to store xml
files in postgres. So maybe a field of type "text" willl take care of
my needs. What is the size limit on fields of type text?
Thanks,
John
--
********************************
** John Thorhauer
** jthorhauer@phoenixcolor.com
********************************
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: jthorhauer@phoenixcolor.com
Subject: Re: jdbc large object support ??
In-Reply-To: <3976128E.97AF0074@phoenixcolor.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox