pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:15:34 +0900
Message-ID: <3E1BA5E6.9463718F@tpf.co.jp> (raw)
References: <200301072329.h07NT2X28922@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<27934.1041984327@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<3E1B9DCD.75859501@tpf.co.jp>
	<501.1041997832@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Sure.  FETCH n in Postgres has always corresponded to FETCH RELATIVE n.

IIRC in SQL standard FETCH retrieves rows one by one.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
	http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/

view thread (25+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3E1BA5E6.9463718F@tpf.co.jp>
Permalink:  ../3E1BA5E6.9463718F@tpf.co.jp/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3E1BA5E6.9463718F@tpf.co.jp

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: Inoue@tpf.co.jp, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
  Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
  In-Reply-To: <3E1BA5E6.9463718F@tpf.co.jp>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox