pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:10:49 +1030
Message-ID: <3E6D4CB1.4070900@postgresql.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303102330.h2ANUii26036@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200303102330.h2ANUii26036@candle.pha.pa.us>

Bruce Momjian wrote:
<snip>
> So, what should we do?  Should we go another month or two and just wait
> until we have enough must-have features?  While not waiting on specific
> features, it _is_ waiting for something to warrant a release.  I guess
> the big question is whether we release on a scheduled-basis or a
> enough-features-basis.

Hmmm, I feel we should decide on features that will make an 8.0 release 
meaningful, and *somehow* work to making sure they are ready for the 
release.

With 7.1/7.2, Tom mentioned us being delayed because specific features 
we were waiting for became dependant on one person.

Would it be feasible to investigate approaches for having the Win32 and 
PITR work be shared amongst a few very-interested volunteers, so that 
people can cover for each other's downtime?  Not sure of the 
confidentiality level of the Win32/PITR patches at present, but I'd 
guess there would be at least a few solid volunteers willing to 
contribute to the Win32/PITR ports if we asked for people to step forwards.

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

-- 
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi




view thread (133+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3E6D4CB1.4070900@postgresql.org>
Permalink:  ../3E6D4CB1.4070900@postgresql.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3E6D4CB1.4070900@postgresql.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: justin@postgresql.org, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
  In-Reply-To: <3E6D4CB1.4070900@postgresql.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox