pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Wei Weng <wweng@kencast.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Is PGconn* thread safe?
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:09:35 -0500
Message-ID: <3E833E5F.6090107@kencast.com> (raw)

Can I use two threads to use one PGconn* or do I have to assign them 
each one with a unique PGconn*?

I searched in the mailing list archive, but couldn't find anything 
recent that has mentioned the thread safeness of libpq/PGconn*.

Thanks a lot!

Wei

view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3E833E5F.6090107@kencast.com>
Permalink:  ../3E833E5F.6090107@kencast.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3E833E5F.6090107@kencast.com

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: wweng@kencast.com
  Subject: Re: Is PGconn* thread safe?
  In-Reply-To: <3E833E5F.6090107@kencast.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox