From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: observations about temporary tables and schemas
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:36:46 +0200
Message-ID: <3F69A6DE.1050002@bigfoot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2054.1063808792@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0309161858470.30978-100000@leary.csoft.net>
<2054.1063808792@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> I think we have two choices: disallow foreign-key references from temp
> tables to permanent tables, or take out the optimization of storing
> temp table pages in private memory. (That would leave the whole "local
> buffer manager" module as dead code, I think.) I'm kinda leaning
> towards the first; does anyone feel that it's a valuable feature to keep?
My vote is for remove this feature.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: mendola@bigfoot.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: observations about temporary tables and schemas
In-Reply-To: <3F69A6DE.1050002@bigfoot.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox