From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Mount <petermount@maidstone.gov.uk>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:44:01 -0400
Message-ID: <4983.972391441@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B461@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
References: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B461@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
Peter Mount <petermount@maidstone.gov.uk> writes:
> Idea: As we have this type of query in more than one part of the source tree
> (ie: psql, jdbc, probably odbc), should we have a section in the
> documentation containing common queries, like: retrieving a list of tables,
> views etc?
That's a good thought. It'd be a useful practice to review such
standard queries from time to time anyway. For example, now that
outer joins work, a lot of psql's backslash-command queries could
be simplified (don't need the UNION ALL WITH SELECT NULL hack).
Anyone have time to work up a list?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, petermount@maidstone.gov.uk, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
In-Reply-To: <4983.972391441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox