From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Cedar Cox <cedarc@visionforisrael.com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ODBC problem - crypt..
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 18:18:31 -0400
Message-ID: <7529.971129911@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010092332560.23306-100000@nanu.visionforisrael.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010092332560.23306-100000@nanu.visionforisrael.com>
Cedar Cox <cedarc@visionforisrael.com> writes:
> So. If working with sensitive data, shouldn't the data be encrypted as
> well, not just the login sequence?
Yup; see SSL.
IIRC this was one of the reasons why a sniff-proof password security
protocol didn't seem like a critical issue.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, cedarc@visionforisrael.com
Subject: Re: ODBC problem - crypt..
In-Reply-To: <7529.971129911@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox