From: Aleksey Demakov <avd@gcom.ru>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ORB API
Date: 16 Nov 1998 11:13:37 +0600
Message-ID: <87d86onrst.fsf@avd.garsib.ru> (raw)
References: <000401be1069$097314e0$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com>
"Taral" <taral@cyberjunkie.com> writes:
> It appears that the C/C++ API for ORBs is very well defined. However they
> are (especially in the case of pseudo-objects) not simply related. If we are
> to support multiple ORBs, we will have to have a C to C++ thunking layer
> somewhere...
I'd suggest to support only one CORBA implementation in the PostgreSQL
itself. It's IIOP that supposed to let different implementations to
interoperate.
I believe that ORBit is the best candidate, though it's not yet
complete and its ability to interoperate with other implementations
is to be proven. But unlike others it doesn't require egcs or
OS thread support (omniORB). It is intended for real work, not
for education (mico). It is in active development wich we can
join to.
Aleksey
--
Aleksey Demakov
avd@gcom.ru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: avd@gcom.ru
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ORB API
In-Reply-To: <87d86onrst.fsf@avd.garsib.ru>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox