From: Adam Witney <awitney@sghms.ac.uk>
To: Rudy Lippan <rlippan@remotelinux.com>
Cc: Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Cc: DBD-pg <dbdpg-general@gborg.postgresql.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 12:47:03 +0100
Message-ID: <BAB9C6C7.16524%a.witney@sghms.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304082301530.28243-100000@elfride.ineffable.net>
On 9/4/03 4:26 am, "Rudy Lippan" <rlippan@remotelinux.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Adam Witney wrote:
>
>>>> t/03bind............ok
>>>> t/04execute.........ok 9/13*** malloc[20356]: error for object 0x235c20:
>>>> Incorrect checksum for freed object - object was probably modified after
>>>> being freed; break at szone_error
>>>> *** malloc[20356]: error for object 0x235c20: Incorrect checksum for freed
>>>> object - object was probably modified after being freed; break at
>>>> szone_error
>>>> t/04execute.........dubious
>>>> Test returned status 0 (wstat 11, 0xb)
>>>> DIED. FAILED tests 10-13
>>>> Failed 4/13 tests, 69.23% okay
>>>
>>> I do not like the looks of this. Did this test fail with DBD::Pg 1.21?
>>
>> Just downloaded, built and tested DBD-Pg-1.21 with no problems.
>>
>
> I don't see why 1.21 should work while 1.22 failes, so all I can say is
> If 1.21 works, use it. If you see this 1.21, you might want to
> try what is in CVS because much of the prepare, quoting and execute code
> was rewritten and might have fixed the issue.
The only problem is I wanted to try out the "Transform Perl arrays into
PostgreSQL arrays" feature in 1.22
Ok, so have tried the make test again and now I get this
t/04execute.........ok 9/13Attempt to free non-existent shared string at
t/04execute.t line 87.
t/04execute.........dubious
Test returned status 0 (wstat 10, 0xa)
DIED. FAILED tests 10-13
Failed 4/13 tests, 69.23% okay
Have been building apache and mod_perl in between (presumably irrelevent for
this?) and have of course had several restarts of the machine (laptop)... So
apart from this nothing else should have changed.
Does this help finding the problem?
Thanks
adam
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: awitney@sghms.ac.uk, rlippan@remotelinux.com, barwick@gmx.net, dbdpg-general@gborg.postgresql.org, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22
In-Reply-To: <BAB9C6C7.16524%a.witney@sghms.ac.uk>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox