From: Jackson, DeJuan <djackson@cpsgroup.com>
To: Memphisto <szoli@valerie.inf.elte.hu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] My further experiences with ecpg
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 11:48:33 -0500
Message-ID: <F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F45FE9F@cpsmail> (raw)
Hi,
I found out that I didn't have an exec sql commit at the and of the
program. With that finally psql does know about the table(pgacces still
doesn't).
A question: can this ecpg stuff be used for developing PostgreSQL
applications or shall I forget it go to use libpq?
Thanks in advance
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-=
-------
Sebesty=E9n Zolt=E1n AKA Memphisto It all seems so stupid,
it makes me want to give up.=20
szoli@neumann.cs.elte.hu But why should I give up,
when it all seems so stupid?=20
MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft
Widows
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: djackson@cpsgroup.com, szoli@valerie.inf.elte.hu
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] My further experiences with ecpg
In-Reply-To: <F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F45FE9F@cpsmail>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox