From: Oscar Serrano <oserra@fondos.net>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:02:39 +0100
Message-ID: <NDBBKNFDELOHICEHIMGGKEDLCJAA.oserra@fondos.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A289E@woody.vale-housing.co.uk>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org]En nombre de Dave Page
> Enviado el: jueves, 18 de enero de 2001 9:06
> Para: 'The Hermit Hacker'; pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> Asunto: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy@hub.org]
> > Sent: 18 January 2001 03:26
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > Subject: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> >
> >
> >
> > After some discussions with various members of the project, it was
> > suggested that an RFC be sent out to the -interfaces list asking for
> > opinions ...
> >
> > Due to the growing volume on these lists, primarily around
> > the ODBC and
> > JDBC drivers, I'm proposing that a split to this list be
> > made, so that we
> > have:
I completly agree. I'm not interested in JDBC nor ODBC.
thank you.
Oscar Serrano.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: oserra@fondos.net
Subject: RE: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKNFDELOHICEHIMGGKEDLCJAA.oserra@fondos.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox