From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
Cc: Janossy Gergely <gjano@freemail.hu>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: jdbc driver: Why it isn't jdbcCompliant?
Date: 30 May 2000 01:23:46 +0200
Message-ID: <x61z2lx7nh.fsf@thor.candleweb.no> (raw)
References: <00052701341103.02227@azul>
<x6snv3ot1g.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
<3932BC0A.482A765B@selectacast.net>
Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net> writes:
Yes - your point being ? I think that you will find that most JDBC drivers
out there do not implement the spec. to the letter. But using good OO
design principles and adapters you can easily use a subset of the spec(plus
your favorite non SQL 92 database extensions) together with appropriate
adaptors to keep things fairly easy to port between databases. The four
databases that I know best Sybase ASE, PosgreSQL, Progress V9.1 and MySQL
do not fully implement the JDBC spec. But then again I think SQL 92 is the
same story...
Regards,
Gunnar
> >From the Driver source code:
> public boolean jdbcCompliant()
> {
> return false;
> }
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: gunnar@candleweb.no, jks@selectacast.net, gjano@freemail.hu
Subject: Re: jdbc driver: Why it isn't jdbcCompliant?
In-Reply-To: <x61z2lx7nh.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox