From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus@omniti.com>
Cc: josh.berkus@sun.com, robert.lor@sun.com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:24:59 -0400
Message-ID: <10192.1146356699@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604300016.k3U0GGu13388@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200604300016.k3U0GGu13388@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> In short, it ain't broken and we don't need to fix it.
> Agreed. Should the new Solaris ASM code be modified?
No, I have no objection to the new code for Solaris. I just don't want
to go off changing TAS macros for the sake of change.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, jesus@omniti.com
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
In-Reply-To: <10192.1146356699@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox