pg.ddx.io  pgsql-patches@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery (v8)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:51:30 +0200
Message-ID: <492176E2.1000006@enterprisedb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223472898.4747.310.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>
References: <1222815151.4445.1397.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>
	<48EC9CC5.6060803@enterprisedb.com>
	<1223468660.4747.294.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>
	<1223472898.4747.310.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>

Simon Riggs wrote:
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/subtrans.c b/src/backend/access/transam/
> index 063b366..5e64cb4 100644
> --- a/src/backend/access/transam/subtrans.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/subtrans.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ ZeroSUBTRANSPage(int pageno)
>   *
>   * oldestActiveXID is the oldest XID of any prepared transaction, or nextXid
>   * if there are none.
> + *
> + * Note that this is not atomic and is not yet safe to perform while other
> + * processes might access subtrans.
>   */
>  void
>  StartupSUBTRANS(TransactionId oldestActiveXID)

I'm a bit confused by that comment. Does that need to be fixed? It 
sounds like it does, because other processes might access subtrans when 
StartupSUBTRANS is called, with the patch to allow read-only queries 
during recovery. Or is that done in the hot standby patch?

However, I don't see why that isn't safe. StartupSUBTRANS takes the 
SubtransControlLock in exclusive mode while it zeroes out subtrans.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



view thread (25+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <492176E2.1000006@enterprisedb.com>
Permalink:  ../492176E2.1000006@enterprisedb.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/492176E2.1000006@enterprisedb.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
  Cc: heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com, simon@2ndQuadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery (v8)
  In-Reply-To: <492176E2.1000006@enterprisedb.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox