From: Franklin Haut <franklin.haut@gmail.com>
To: 'Ron' <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: pg_dump slow
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:29:35 -0300
Message-ID: <000301c5f672$e5473180$8500a8c0@FRANKLIN> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.0.20051130190827.01d9c958@earthlink.net>
I Maked a new install on machine this night, and the same results, on
console localhost
Windows 2000 Server
Version 5.00.2195
PG Version 8.1
Franklin
>Franlin: are you making pg_dump from local or remote box and is this a
>clean install? Try fresh patched win2k install and see what happens.
He claimed this was local, not network. It is certainly an
intriguing possibility that W2K and WinXP handle bytea
differently. I'm not competent to comment on that however.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: franklin.haut@gmail.com, rjpeace@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: pg_dump slow
In-Reply-To: <000301c5f672$e5473180$8500a8c0@FRANKLIN>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox