From: Anibal David Acosta <aa@devshock.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: how much postgres can scale up?
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:29:14 -0400
Message-ID: <000601cc2761$a2e3a280$e8aae780$@devshock.com> (raw)
I have a function in pgsql language, this function do some select to some
tables for verify some conditions and then do one insert to a table with NO
index. Update are not performed in the function
When 1 client connected postgres do 180 execution per second
With 2 clients connected postgres do 110 execution per second
With 3 clients connected postgres do 90 execution per second
Finally with 6 connected clients postgres do 60 executions per second
(totally 360 executions per second)
While testing, I monitor disk, memory and CPU and not found any overload.
I know that with this information you can figure out somethigns, but in
normal conditions, Is normal the degradation of performance per connection
when connections are incremented?
Or should I spect 180 in the first and something similar in the second
connection? Maybe 170?
The server is a dual xeon quad core with 16 GB of ram and a very fast
storage
The OS is a windows 2008 R2 x64
Thanks
Anibal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: aa@devshock.com
Subject: Re: how much postgres can scale up?
In-Reply-To: <000601cc2761$a2e3a280$e8aae780$@devshock.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox