From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: 'belal hamed' <belalhamed@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL over internet
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:23:24 +1300
Message-ID: <001b01cdfccc$2b5fa9b0$821efd10$@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHsqH1zQUj5po-1eHK7j_z7k+VdHWNWBK7XfbCxuRskkAj5LSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHsqH1zQUj5po-1eHK7j_z7k+VdHWNWBK7XfbCxuRskkAj5LSQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
> From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of belal hamed
> Sent: 27 January 2013 13:16
> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL over internet
> by wireshark I monitor TCP packets I found total data transmit/received
400B
> I took about 2.5s to fetch results why ??????
Are you sure there's not any QOS somewhere that is slowing down the packets
for port 5432 or whichever you're using for PostgreSQL?
Perhaps temporarily changing PostgreSQL's listening port to something else
might be a good test.
David
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dgrowleyml@gmail.com, belalhamed@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL over internet
In-Reply-To: <001b01cdfccc$2b5fa9b0$821efd10$@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox