From: Benjamin Arai <benjamin@araisoft.com>
To: 'Bruno Wolff III' <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Question about clustering multiple columns
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:55:38 -0700
Message-ID: <003201c69176$7694f5c0$63bee140$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060616185556.GA12618@wolff.to>
References: <002e01c68f03$05f00e10$6501a8c0@uni>
<20060616153132.GA9056@wolff.to>
<002301c69170$5d715170$1853f450$@com>
<20060616185556.GA12618@wolff.to>
Thanks! This exactly what I was looking for.
Benjamin Arai
Benjamin@araisoft.com
http://www.benjaminarai.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Wolff III [mailto:bruno@wolff.to]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:56 AM
To: Benjamin Arai
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Question about clustering multiple columns
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:11:59 -0700,
Benjamin Arai <benjamin@araisoft.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I have one more question. Does it matter in
> which order that I make the index?
Please keep replies copied to the lists so that other people can learn from
and crontibute to the discussion.
In this case I am just going to copy back to the performance list, since it
is generally better for perfomance questions than the general list.
> For example, should I create an index cusip,date or date,cusip, does
> it matter which order. My goal is to cluster the entries by cusip,
> then for each cusip order the data by date (maybe the order by data
> occurs automatically). Hm, in that case maybe I only need to cluster
> by cusip, but then how do I ensure that each cusip had its data ordered by
date?
I think that you want to order by cusip (assuming that corresponds to "name"
in you sample query below) first. You won't end up having to go through
values in the index that will be filtered out if you do it that way.
The documentation for the cluster command says that it clusters on indexes,
not columns. So if the index is on (cusip, date), then the records will be
ordered by cusip, date immediately after the cluster. (New records added
after the cluster are not guarenteed to be ordered by the index.)
>
> Benjamin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruno Wolff III [mailto:bruno@wolff.to]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:32 AM
> To: Benjamin Arai
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: Question about clustering multiple columns
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:04:15 -0700,
> Benjamin Arai <benjamin@araisoft.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a database where there are three columns (name,date,data).
> > The queries are almost always something like SELECT date,data FROM
> > table WHERE name=blah AND date > 1/1/2005 AND date < 1/1/2006;. I
> > currently have three B-tree indexes, one for each of the columns.
> > Is clustering on date index going to be what I want, or do I need a
> > index that contains both name and date?
>
> I would expect that clustering on the name would be better for the
> above query.
> You probably want an index on name and date combined.
>
>
>
!DSPAM:4492fdfd193631139819016!
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: benjamin@araisoft.com, bruno@wolff.to
Subject: Re: Question about clustering multiple columns
In-Reply-To: <003201c69176$7694f5c0$63bee140$@com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox