pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David logan <djlogan2@comcast.net>
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:38:21 -0600
Message-ID: <006b01c923e4$25da50f0$718ef2d0$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8396.1222867812@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <004001c923be$d8b1f730$8a15e590$@net>
	<8396.1222867812@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Looks like that worked. I set work_mem to 256MB, and it looks like my
standard sql came back in just a couple of seconds.

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 07:30
To: David logan
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query 

"David logan" <djlogan2@comcast.net> writes:
> (The question is why this simple select takes me 20 minutes to run...)

What have you got work_mem set to?  The hash join is not going to be
real fast if it has to split the join into multiple batches, so you
want work_mem large enough to hold the whole inner relation.  That would
be at least 20MB in this example, probably quite a bit more after
allowing for per-row overhead in the table.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance




view thread (3+ messages)

Message-ID: <006b01c923e4$25da50f0$718ef2d0$@net>
Permalink:  ../006b01c923e4$25da50f0$718ef2d0$@net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/006b01c923e4$25da50f0$718ef2d0$@net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: djlogan2@comcast.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query
  In-Reply-To: <006b01c923e4$25da50f0$718ef2d0$@net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox