pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mindaugas <mind@bi.lt>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Core 2 or Opteron
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:18:21 +0200
Message-ID: <019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt> (raw)


  Hello,

  We're planning new server or two for PostgreSQL and I'm wondering Intel
Core 2 (Woodcrest for servers?) or Opteron is faster for PostgreSQL now?

  When I look through hardware sites Core 2 wins. But I believe those tests
mostly are being done in 32 bits. Does the picture change in 64 bits?

  And I also remember that in PostgreSQL Opteron earlier had huge advantage
over older Xeons. But did Intel manage to change picture now?

  Thanks,

  Mindaugas




view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt>
Permalink:  ../019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mind@bi.lt
  Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
  In-Reply-To: <019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox