From: Dave Dutcher <dave@tridecap.com>
To: 'Vincenzo Romano' <vincenzo.romano@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Weird performance drop
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:34:10 -0500
Message-ID: <01ea01c772d8$7b87aca0$2e00a8c0@tridecap.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703300836.16601.Vincenzo.Romano@gmail.com>
> From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Vincenzo Romano
>
> Is there any "workaround"?
>
> In my opinion the later the query planner decisions are taken the more
> effective they can be.
> It could be an option for the function (body) to delay any
> query planner
> decision.
I think a possible workaround is to use a plpgsql function and the execute
statement. The docs will have more info.
Dave
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dave@tridecap.com, vincenzo.romano@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Weird performance drop
In-Reply-To: <01ea01c772d8$7b87aca0$2e00a8c0@tridecap.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox