pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Dutcher <dave@tridecap.com>
To: 'Thomas Vatter' <thomas.vatter@network-inventory.de>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: in memory views
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:08:49 -0500
Message-ID: <01fd01c67475$ef17d530$8300a8c0@tridecap.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <446252E8.8000304@network-inventory.de>

Are you using the Postgres JDBC driver?  Or are you using an ODBC JDBC
driver?  The Postgres specific driver is usually faster.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Vatter
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 3:54 PM
To: Scott Marlowe
Cc: Tino Wildenhain; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] in memory views


Scott Marlowe wrote: 

On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 10:41, Thomas Vatter wrote:

  

Scott Marlowe wrote: 

    



  

What happens if you do this by declaring it as a cursor and then

fetching the first row?

      



  

  

      

I do executeQuery(), for the resultSet I do next() and return one row,

but wait, I have to review the logic in this area, I can tell you

tomorrow

    





A good short test is to run explain analyze on the query from the psql

command line.  If it shows an execution time of significantly less than

what you get from you application, then it is likely that the real

problem is that your application is receiving the whole result set via

libpq and waiting for that.  A cursor will solve that problem.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?



               http://archives.postgresql.org





  

Yes, the difference between psql command line and application is 6
seconds to 40 seconds. It is
exactly the step resultSet = excecuteQuery() that needs 40 seconds. I
use next() as a cursor
through the resultSet, but I fear this is not enough, do I have to use
createStatement(resultSetType, 
resultSetConcurrency) respectively prepareStatement (resultSetType,
resultSetConcurrency) to
achieve the cursor behaviour?

regards
tom

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <01fd01c67475$ef17d530$8300a8c0@tridecap.com>
Permalink:  ../01fd01c67475$ef17d530$8300a8c0@tridecap.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/01fd01c67475$ef17d530$8300a8c0@tridecap.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: dave@tridecap.com, thomas.vatter@network-inventory.de
  Subject: Re: in memory views
  In-Reply-To: <01fd01c67475$ef17d530$8300a8c0@tridecap.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox