From: mark <dvlhntr@gmail.com>
To: 'Scott Marlowe' <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: 'Glyn Astill' <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: 'Kevin Grittner' <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: 'Joshua D. Drake' <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:05:22 -0600
Message-ID: <028401cbf8a5$5260f7d0$f722e770$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik2+T3xmpStJNVxWzXQWgxU14bVeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8b76c51ad6db2e458431ef73bcdd2759@commandprompt.com>
<895662.51387.qm@web26005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
<BANLkTik2+T3xmpStJNVxWzXQWgxU14bVeA@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:29 PM
> To: Glyn Astill
> Cc: Kevin Grittner; Joshua D. Drake; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- On Mon, 11/4/11, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
> >> To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
> >> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, "Glyn Astill"
> <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
> >> Date: Monday, 11 April, 2011, 19:12
> >> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:09:15 -0500,
> >> "Kevin Grittner"
> >> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The new server uses 4 x 8 core Xeon X7550 CPUs at
> >> 2Ghz
> >> >
> >> > Which has hyperthreading.
> >> >
> >> >> our current servers are 2 x 4 core Xeon E5320 CPUs
> >> at 2Ghz.
> >> >
> >> > Which doesn't have hyperthreading.
> >> >
> >
> > Yep, off. If you look at the benchmarks I took, HT absoloutely killed
> it.
> >
> >> > PostgreSQL often performs worse with hyperthreading
> >> than without.
> >> > Have you turned HT off on your new machine? If
> >> not, I would start
> >> > there.
> >>
> >> And then make sure you aren't running CFQ.
> >>
> >> JD
> >>
> >
> > Not running CFQ, running the no-op i/o scheduler.
>
> Just FYI, in synthetic pgbench type benchmarks, a 48 core AMD Magny
> Cours with LSI HW RAID and 34 15k6 Hard drives scales almost linearly
> up to 48 or so threads, getting into the 7000+ tps range. With SW
> RAID it gets into the 5500 tps range.
Just wondering, which LSI card ?
Was this 32 drives in Raid 1+0 with a two drive raid 1 for logs or some
other config?
-M
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-
> performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dvlhntr@gmail.com, scott.marlowe@gmail.com, glynastill@yahoo.co.uk, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, jd@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
In-Reply-To: <028401cbf8a5$5260f7d0$f722e770$@com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox