From: Dave Dutcher <dave@tridecap.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:58:48 -0500
Message-ID: <030a01c68fba$a90f5080$8300a8c0@tridecap.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wtbkcqzh.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Greg Stark
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 11:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] OT - select + must have from - sql
> standard syntax?
[SNIP]
>
> Well you could always create a "dual", it was always just a
> regular table. We
> used to joke about what would happen to Oracle if you
> inserted an extra row in
> it...
I've never used Oracle, so I don't understand why its called dual when
it only has one row? Shouldn't it be called single? :\
Dave
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dave@tridecap.com
Subject: Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?
In-Reply-To: <030a01c68fba$a90f5080$8300a8c0@tridecap.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox