pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg@dmi.dk>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: full outer performance problem
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:45:42 -0400
Message-ID: <10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428078E6.90007@dmi.dk>
References: <428078E6.90007@dmi.dk>

Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg@dmi.dk> writes:
> I have two BIG tables (virtually identical) with 3 NOT NULL columns 
> Station_id, TimeObs, Temp_XXXX, with indexes on (Station_id, TimeObs) 
> and valid ANALYSE (set statistics=100). I want to join the two tables 
> with a FULL OUTER JOIN.

I'm confused.  If the columns are NOT NULL, why isn't this a valid
transformation of your original query?

> select temp_max_60min,temp_dry_at_2m
> from station s natural join
> temp_dry_at_2m a full outer join temp_max_60min b using (station_id, timeobs)
> where s.wmo_id=6065 
> and _a.timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0' and b._timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0' 
> and '2004-1-1 0:0:0' between s.startdate and s.enddate;

Seems like it's not eliminating any rows that would otherwise succeed.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, kib+pg@dmi.dk
  Subject: Re: full outer performance problem
  In-Reply-To: <10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox