From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:31:56 -0400
Message-ID: <10726.1147181516@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.s89zl30wcigqcu@apollo13>
References: <445F7FF8.6070707@comcast.net>
<1147110142.32369.7.camel@archimedes>
<20060508175013.GY99570@pervasive.com>
<28288.1147111196@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<op.s89zl30wcigqcu@apollo13>
PFC <lists@peufeu.com> writes:
> Feature proposal :
> A way to store query results in a named buffer and reuse them in the next
> queries.
Why not just fix the speed issues you're complaining about with temp
tables? I see no reason to invent a new concept.
(Now, "just fix" might be easier said than done, but inventing an
essentially duplicate facility would be a lot of work too.)
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lists@peufeu.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
In-Reply-To: <10726.1147181516@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox