From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: rverghese <riyav@hotmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: -EXT-Re: Table not using tsvector gin index and performance much worse than when it uses it.
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 21:08:25 -0400
Message-ID: <10942.1491440905@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491438412093-5954509.post@n3.nabble.com>
References: <1491432671098-5954485.post@n3.nabble.com>
<5326.1491434397@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1491436440096-5954503.post@n3.nabble.com>
<fb871f19d7894a0cb5e60c7dfac17534@TOREXCPWP03.ga.com>
<1491438412093-5954509.post@n3.nabble.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
rverghese <riyav@hotmail.com> writes:
> Will play around with those settings as well. Maybe start with default which
> is 50 I believe.
If you're on 9.5, auto-analyze does not result in a pending list flush,
so it's irrelevant to fixing your problem. (Assuming I've identified
the problem correctly.) But you do have gin_pending_list_limit, so see
what that does for you. Note you can set it either globally or per-index.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, riyav@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: -EXT-Re: Table not using tsvector gin index and performance much worse than when it uses it.
In-Reply-To: <10942.1491440905@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox