From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: mischa@ca.sophos.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:22:07 -0400
Message-ID: <11046.1150237327@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448F3A6E.6080908@ca.sophos.com>
References: <1150151282.14661.42.camel@tigger>
<20060613000441.GI8588@kenobi.snowman.net>
<20060613200810.GZ34196@pervasive.com>
<448F3A6E.6080908@ca.sophos.com>
Mischa Sandberg <mischa@ca.sophos.com> writes:
> vmstat showed that it was swapping like crazy.
> Dropped shared_buffers back down again.
> Swapping stopped.
Does Solaris have any call that allows locking a shmem segment in RAM?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mischa@ca.sophos.com
Subject: Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
In-Reply-To: <11046.1150237327@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox